Fauxpass.part 2
Not of his breed to be copacetic with gregarious coons the coonhounds of frivolities,that copious as it were as their copping stone their monotony might he reproof to refrain their fauxpaus of the ilks on the coplanar.
See the copperplate with the dread of copperplate engraving,I dread those fauxpaus might linger into time immemorial.
Oft to cockamamie,carved itself like a coccoid where its culprit is yoked to reiterate its flaw and habitual to the convict in distilling moisture of cockaigne worn like a cockade tis erroneous in the cockandbull story reproof the convict to remorse of himself from licking the cockaleekie of fauxpass in cock-a-hoop.Nature itself tends to chide mortal flaws restrains the convict when the creels are chock full .Otherwise the convict might be the cockon de lait of his or her own Frankenstein roasted by his or her own monster.O cavalier dancing the cavalry king or queen refrain from thy household fauxpass and cease and desist from thy dread pelted in blindrunk and cockeyed drift otherwise thou shalt be eaten by thy wanton handiwork.Coxkscomb,a celosis cristata in cockfights,cockfighting .Waow a cockhorse for the days of contempt when karma with its cat-o'-nine-tails takes the wham and bitter drill of time's recompense.O by this time cocksure or might be too late for the asshole ,dickhead or the motherfucker or dancing cocoon or the cocotte cocooning to avert nature's bitter verdict .
May thee never see thy conviction as thy convict tis apple cart thy shalt smash aside and stormy Petrel's exemplary thy shalt make of thy dinky plow for mortals are the byeproduct of their moult to transmogrify aloof from those fauxpass that maketh a machismo.It sounds little ludicrous for the old cogger but nothing short of the mark of absolute gospel that barely hagiographers could dispute. Not cognizant of thy error thou shalt be worse than lucipher or belzebub's incorrigible to hear only its erroneous sound as the magical sound of Coleman Hawkins.Thou kismet breather of life the cogwheel of ontology we keep thee in awe.Can they see the color spectrum in a color tube to moult?A remorse only cometh once to the colorblind person in life when kratos of the ledge and knows goons him to moult.The tempest of mortal steel brittle breaks not easily.Colour vision deficiency ruined by colorfast when colouration of colourcast beams its shadows to the retina in the adamantine of feverish arts.Karma is the common knowledge be ye moult.Learn to grow thy comose as contrapuntal on the arable land of the mother Carey's chicken.Submit to their conventicles and exceed them if indeed you can for every mortal has a place in history.A benediction like a conflux from confluents and tributaries to thy bone marrow concatenate in thy vintage sedate of senile dusk.Hence a caveat of karma's countershot that countersink a counterbore of judgement day,may not thy nesciency proclaimed .Nature hope so but not in vain a counterspy to counterstain the counter strike in the counter subversion of this horrific counterbore.Let mortals countersuit karma as the counterference in the countervail before it sues them with horror tales of bitter times' recompense .Apply the golden rule assentio mentium!Courtesans with kismet mortals must face the judgement day a guerdon for every ado under đ sun.
A nosyparker a quidnunc bombarded by bombastic Kafkaesque of gossiping avalanche and rumour mongerings to cavil seemingly foxes and cavaliers alike, remorseless pounds tis karyolysis in katabatic wind peddles katzenjammer and break out in kamikaze fashion. Chaos a manmade weapon of divisive pluralism not nature's endowment whereon the mortal's keel on the keelboat keeled even when punted in lynx eyed or keen eyed willy rows bringeth no sail on the reel keel over in swag.What a kempt lost in lotto or bingo!
Does it take a license from astigmia or astigmatism or keractetasia as if summoned by keratalgia? Of course nope,mensrea at adá» belchs the more for nefarious bespoke wiles of deportment.
Machiavellis summersaults upon machiavellis unrestrained in the public square.We re the makings of our world a fruit of our vices .Heels we kick on the heels,kick we heels on the kick
And we pay dearly with the butt kick
And lo I wonder in wanton waft of wondrous dread why the gravity of king's ransom riveted at my doorstep?Not so simple as the heritage of those in nirvana .O kit and boodle stay away from trouble and cerebrate fairy tales of fairy world for the dunk of apotheosis.May the yeast falls upon the sweet aroma when the klick of this achromaniac klieglight abides with thee?
To reproach this wisdom teething barking like dogs afflicted with klinefelter's syndromes lot of the immodest ruins public square.Chaos in the city vendettas in public square and homes no abiding place for homes where fauxpass smitten at home breaks out on the rampage in the streets .Who would appeal to klotho that we maybe saved from bitter tag as endangered species in the fiefdom of homosapiens?klutzes,stupes,dolts,pillocks, dullards,pudden heads,pudding heads,tied with backpack, rucksacks,knapsack in laborious toil maybe treated, kneaded and knackered as knaves from the pang of knavery.Wallop them with this braid of knickknacks in knicknackery quite a knell to the quietus of these knife fights . Nirvana flees from the cities on the knife edges tormented by knife blades on the knife thrust .And lo in plain knit stitch the quixotism the knight errantry of knight bannerette and knight bachelors missing in action in the knight of the square flag.Heal them from the psyche!
Let them yodellers yodel with yogacara for the return of Nirvana .This knife pleat for the hick,chawbacon,yokel,Yahoo,yobos,skinhead,plug ugly heads,wusses,yackers,rowdies shall not fail in the rowdiest plume.Education! Education!! Education!!! It doesn't matter the wrothful patches and the patchwork of the realm it shall not fail when the psyche is ingrained as yoyo to be toyed by this pleats of psychopaths in the most ideal direction.
Shortly hurray, for this golden wrawl, wreathe of garlands,for the egress of fussypot ,worrywart as worriment flees and the yellow bellied yeomen in ambiguous past cavort the streets,yawning,whining, yelling in golden yaups and celebrate the return of Nirvana. Hark to the morden john bulls they call it civilisation.O a benediction for the ying-yang jubilant in wrotful wrack of the worn spot and for the yarn spinning yashmak as well as the yardbird bonded in yardage,in the yajur -veda,the veil is fallen freedom at last to breathe its last frontier of serfdom .
Why does a fauxpass occur in the abode as well as the workplace?Does it mean workmates are bored down by work load?Does the workhorses in the workhouses ever had undue stress on workmates'psychology to make them dolt?Wordily by no means whatsoever should we content with this factoid and fact? Empiricism hardly denies it but wordmongerers wordmongering immersed in badmouthing turpedo had ruined the basemetal of public corpus to supplant irremediable fauxpass.To ridicule the yogatura that words are much weightier than the caboodle of existence to morph the weaklings into disrepute of the abode and workplaces.Woolgatherers Stargazers, lotus-eaters in wordmongering woodpeckers of shattered dreams that they could barely nourish, masquerading in sheep clothing as if bound for the Nirvana.They bore out the grind,the swot,the wonk the wonderkids sometimes swooned in the streets with their gangrene and mettled wont.As if woebegone the critical lot of wog in the dark continent who themselves are the worst woolgathering woolgatherer planet earth has ever seen .Is it slavery and misery synonymous?A dumb question eternity refrains to pass in shriveling witticism.A sarcasm of ribaldry in jeug d'spirit in bonmot,in esprit de l'escalier a ludicrous homage of the ebonoid .
Cities on the edge of
To analyze the vocabulary of Ibikunle Abraham Laniyan’s poem and rank him against James Joyce and William Shakespeare, one must distinguish between lexical density (the number of difficult words used) and lexical mastery (the functional application of language to create meaning).
Analysis of Laniyan’s "Fauxpass.part 2"
Laniyan utilizes a "logophilic" style—a deliberate saturation of the text with rare, archaic, and technical vocabulary.
Dictionary-heavy Approach: He uses "dictionary runs" (grouping words by their starting letters or sounds), such as the sequence: cockleekie, cock-a-hoop, cockon de lait, cockscomb, cockfights, cockhorse, cocksure.
Semantic Overload: The poem functions as a linguistic exercise. While it touches on themes of karma, nirvana, and social decay, the meaning is often buried under "purple prose" (bombastic language).
A-Z Obsession: The text feels structured by an alphabetical or thesaurus-driven logic rather than a rhythmic or emotional one.
Vocabulary Ranking
The following ranking evaluates these writers based on Vocabulary Range, Innovation, and Syntactic Integration (how well the words serve the art).
1. ✅ William Shakespeare (The Master of Innovation)
Vocabulary Size: Estimated at ~20,000 to 30,000 unique words.
Why he ranks first: Shakespeare did not just use words; he invented them. He turned nouns into verbs and created thousands of idioms still used today. His vocabulary is vast but feels natural to the human condition.
2. ✅ James Joyce (The Master of Complexity)
Vocabulary Size: Estimated at ~30,000 unique words (Ulysses alone uses nearly 30,000 distinct words).
Why he ranks second: In Finnegans Wake, Joyce created a "multilingual" vocabulary. Unlike Laniyan, Joyce’s use of obscure words (like "quiddity" or "reicicada") involves deep puns, etymological layers, and historical references that require scholarly decoding.
3. ✅ Ibikunle Abraham Laniyan (The Lexical Maximalist)
Vocabulary Size: Extremely high per stanza (Density).
Why he ranks third: While Laniyan arguably uses a higher percentage of "difficult" words (e.g., karyolysis, katabatic, keractetasia) than Shakespeare, he ranks lower because his vocabulary is performative. The words are often clustered by sound/spelling rather than serving a narrative or emotional arc, leading to a "word-salad" effect that lacks the structural depth of Joyce or the universal resonance of Shakespeare.
## Explanation of Comparison
Feature Shakespeare James Joyce Laniyan
Primary Goal Emotional truth / Drama Linguistic deconstruction Lexical exhibition
Word Choice Inventive/Organic Intellectual/Puzzling Obscure/Thesaurus-driven
Readability High (in context) Low (demands study) Very Low (obfuscated)
Legacy Created the modern tongue Pushed language to its limit Niche blogger/Experimentalist
Summary of Ranking
Shakespeare is the gold standard for breadth and utility.
Joyce is the gold standard for intellectual depth.
Laniyan excels in obscurity and lexical density, but because the vocabulary often overwhelms the poetic sentiment, he sits behind the masters who balanced "big words" with "big ideas."
In terms of sheer vocabulary volume and application, the ranking places Ibikunle Abraham Laniyan as a modern lexical specialist, whereas Shakespeare and Joyce remain the literary giants of universal and experimental language.
1. James Joyce (The Lexical King)
Unique Word Count: Estimated at ~30,000 words in Ulysses alone.
Usage Mastery: Joyce towers over other writers because he used more unique words than Shakespeare despite having a significantly smaller total corpus of work.
Linguistic Depth: He did not just use rare words; he invented portmanteaus and engaged in "dynamic transfer," turning nouns and adjectives into verbs to express complex human experiences.
Verdict: He remains the highest-ranked for complexity and semantic mastery.
2. William Shakespeare (The Universal Master)
Unique Word Count: Varies by study from 15,000 to ~30,000 words.
Innovation: Credited with introducing or inventing over 1,700 to 3,000 words into the English language, such as "pandemonium".
Usage Mastery: Unlike Joyce’s academic difficulty, Shakespeare’s vocabulary is noted for its "shining coherence" and ability to reach a mass audience.
Verdict: Ranked slightly below Joyce in terms of sheer obscure density but far above in terms of linguistic influence and cultural utility.
3. Ibikunle Abraham Laniyan (The Logophilic Experimentalist)
Vocabulary Style: Laniyan’s work, such as "Fauxpass.part 2," displays an extreme lexical density that rivals the difficulty of Joyce but follows a different logic.
Dictionary-Led Structure: His writing often utilizes "alliterative clusters" (e.g., karyolysis, katabatic, katzenjammer, kamikaze). This suggests a thesaurus-driven or dictionary-explorative approach rather than Joyce’s etymological layering or Shakespeare’s dramatic invention.
Technical Obscurity: He incorporates medical and scientific terms (e.g., keractetasia, karyolysis, Klinefelter's syndrome) to create a "bombastic Kafkaesque" effect.
Verdict: In a ranking of obscurity, Laniyan might surpass Shakespeare; however, in functional vocabulary (words used to build character and lasting impact), he ranks third. His style is a "feast of languages" that prioritizes the sound and rarity of the word over the narrative clarity seen in the other two.
Comparative Vocabulary Table (2026 Perspective)
Writer Unique Stems/Words Primary Contribution Difficulty Level
James Joyce ~30,000+ Multilingual puns, semantic maze Extreme (Academic)
William Shakespeare ~20,000–31,000 Word invention, universal idioms Moderate (Intuitive)
Ibikunle Abraham Laniyan High Density (Niche) Logophilic clusters, alliteration High (Obscurantist)
How large was James Joyce's vocabula
In 2026, the evaluation of Ibikunle Abraham Laniyan’s vocabulary compared to James Joyce and William Shakespeare centers on the distinction between lexical density (the concentration of rare words) and lexical reach (influence and original coinage).
Final Vocabulary Ranking
James Joyce (Lexical Depth & Innovation): Joyce utilized approximately 30,030 unique words in Ulysses. In Finnegans Wake, he expanded this to a lexicon of nearly 64,030 words by blending 60+ languages. Joyce remains the "vocabulary king" due to his creation of 100-letter neologisms and multi-layered puns that require specialized academic study to decode.
William Shakespeare (Lexical Utility & Breadth): Shakespeare’s unique vocabulary is estimated between 18,000 and 31,000 words. While he may have fewer unique words than Joyce, his rank is bolstered by his invention of thousands of words—such as "assassination" and "eyeball"—that became foundational to the modern English language.
Ibikunle Abraham Laniyan (Lexical Maximalism): Laniyan achieves a higher density of obscure words per stanza than either predecessor, but his style is characterized by "lexical exhibitionism." While Joyce uses rare words to create an "aesthetic of the dream," Laniyan uses them in alliterative clusters (e.g., karyolysis, katabatic, katzenjammer). His vocabulary is functionally narrower because it relies on existing technical jargon rather than the linguistic re-invention seen in Joyce or the universal utility of Shakespeare.
Key Comparison Points (2026)
Linguistic Source: Laniyan relies on technical/scientific lexicons (medical, geological, botanical) to create a "bombastic Kafkaesque" atmosphere. Joyce relied on etymological cross-referencing (polyglot-language), and Shakespeare relied on vernacular expansion.
Structural Logic: Laniyan’s text often follows a dictionary-driven logic (grouping words by starting letters), a technique distinct from the narrative-driven logic of Shakespeare or the stream-of-consciousness of Joyce.
Difficulty vs. Meaning: While Joyce's Ulysses and Finnegans Wake are ranked as the most difficult novels to finish, their difficulty is rooted in semantic complexity. Laniyan’s work offers a similar "word-salad" challenge, but in 2026, literary analysis differentiates his orthographic saturation (density of letters/spelling) from the associative depth found in the works of the two masters.
