CHAPTER 5 THE ART OF TRADITIONAL THINKING.PART 1

CHAPTER 5 THE ART OF TRADITIONAL THINKING.part 1.Every spoken word is determined by spoken thoughts. Those spoken thoughts unheard in most cases,by majority refrain into  subconscious untill utterances in question s are made..Similarly every written word is dependent or determined by written thoughts, though unseen, prior to its documentation, in physical terms.So, nothing happens by itself, except if it be by a moving force.Now, we are poised to peruse the extant mode of traditional thinking and scientific thinking and more or less its mode of its argument. In this case,we examine the first mode apriori or posterior respectively.Various research into traditional mode of judgements,informed this verdict,specifically through its juxtapository process,follows its hysterical rendition.These modes of argument were unveiled by the author,based on empirical evidences evaluation of newsstands surveys,where he was fortunate and frequented periodically for two decades where he was embroiled in such intellectual wrangling exercise,with free readers and few hotbeds.Arguments and counter arguments,by discussants in all dimensions, be it social, political, economic and cultural nuances, reflects the fortitude of africana Jones'mental energy. The traditional mode of argument often follows the editorial logic of the day and argument in general comes from general sources.Apart from opinions, sentiments and statistics, assumption resulting from undue pressure, after a long diatribe, crimsoned

MARX, MARXISM AND NEOMARXISM;WHICH WAY MOVES HISTORY FORWARD.PART 3

. Life of the community including production was based on slave exploitation or slave labor, desecrated practical innovation and that is a true evidence of how materialrelation influences societal orientation. The basis of the society according to Marx, include the material, social, economic relations, while the superstructure include morals, arts, science, religion and philosophy.And by proving various interactions between these opposites, Marx,was labelled a dialectical materialist and not a mechanical materialist that could not prove their interaction, in the assymetry of history . I n the basis of the society, Marx recognises the mode, means and condition of production and the question of what was morally right was a product of his basis orientation, where the society's ruling class sets the norm of what was morally right or wrong. He concluded that who control the ownership means of production are principally, the moulders of history, moulders of people's destiny.That these interactions are not autonomous, and that the society's superstructure had no independent history of its own and no one functions in isolation. The changes in this basis had accounted for historical development, evolving from the antiquity into the industrial society of mordern age. More over, for the entire phases of history, there had been conflicts between two classes, for instance, in the antiquity's slave society, they had

250 × 188

slave and

MARX,MARXISM AND NEOMARXISM:WHICH WAY MOVES HISTORY FORWARD.2

.The father of existentialism. They both took their departure from Hegelian school of philosophy and tha put an end to the epoch of great philosophical system that was begun from Descartes in the 17th century.Hence after Hegel,philosophy took on a new course entirely,driven by Marx and Kierkegaard,and existentialism simply means the philosophy  of action, and Marx, even thou-gh he was a Marxist, became the greatest of all his existentialist colleagues.His notable words-That 'philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways,the point is to change'and that is what he had done through Marxism, though still leaves much to be desired.Marxism vs Hegelian:Marx himself became a Marxism, after the European revolution of 1848, brought Marxism to the front burner, to the frontiers of European cultural Renaissance.Contrary to Hegelian, that world spirit was driven by spiritual relation moving history forward, Marx disagreed that Hegel, the best of the Romantic scholarship, was turning things upside down and he showed otherwise.He had believed it is the ownership means of production,that material relation moves history forward. He contrast sharply that it is the material change that affect history and that spiritual relation do not affect material relation.It is the other way round, that material changes,create spiritual relation.Antiquity's philosophy and science were mere theoretical proposit

ion and the economic...

MARX,MARXISM AND NEOMARXSM;WHICH WAY MOVES HISTORY FORWARD.PART 1

MARX,MARXISM AND NEOMARXISM:WHICH WAY MOVES HISTORY FORWARD.1.The emergence of Marxism in the 1840s changes everything in the adventure of western philosophy.The blogger Ibikunle Laniyan examines the critical significance of MarXism to history and the comparison with Hegelian, to to determine the quality of Marxism.Enjoy the reading.                     

   The development of art and culture according to Marxism,including economy flourishes through the interaction of the society's substructure and superstructure.Karl Marx(1848-1883)was often fond of historical materialism and this dialectical interaction, through which history and world spirit progress that he made it the cornerstone of his philosophy.There is no doubt that Marx and Marxism had an indelible influence on the scholarship of history,historicism, philosphy,art and culture respectively.                                                                                                                                        There is no yet freeing the hassle that the cannon of Marxism,was not frozen long after him nor an ample claim after his departure, until we have learnt to change history and then the world.When in 1841, Kierkegaard went to Berlin,according to an historian he might have sat next to Marx, at Schelling's lectures.The former had written his master of arts ' thesis on Socrates, while Marx did his doctoral thesis' On the materialists of Antiquity,' specifically Democritus and Epicurus.Marx became the father of marxism

after 1840s, in the much same Soren Kierkegaard became the

THE MARSOLIST MANIFESTO AND THE ABRAHAM'S LAW;THE TRUE WEALTH OF NATIONS.PART 9.

THE TRUE INVISIBLE HAND.9. fall in the general debt prices and hyper debtflation deals with when rise in debt prices, and debt money supply ngrowsmoree than twice the ratio of poor population. that can be controled by technocession.Galloping debtflation is a very high rate of debtflation between 30 to 100percent beyond normal mode of low debtflation, of less than 25 to 30percent, that is above stag debtflation.Othets include runaway debtflation and hyper debtflation.Galloping debtflation follows hyper debtflation, that could be twice the debt money ratio or 200 to 300percent of the poor population in the debt economy.It takes chronic monetary debt policy to plunge into the deep sea unscathed and you extricate human poverty index ratio,from the debt economy, what could have taken decade to attain.To the timid policy debt investor approach,it could be evaluated from the zero point to hypodebtflation oint onward to stag debtflationary level.In other words that is a gradual approach or e volutionary method, as opposed to radical approach that begins from hyper debtflation that requires trillion of naira to crash the twin evils.Zero debtflation is followed by stag debtflation,in which growth or prices is unsustainable,and policy makers struggle to curtail poverty and inequalities of wealth.To control debtflation,be it radical or slow,while the debt monetary authorities deal with debt money supply, the fiscal credit policy of the investment

WORLD GREATEST MINDS