THE PHILOSOPHY OF FREEDOM.PART 9

being the only offense they had committed,hollow preeminence that followed them later could have been avoided.The same with fascist Italy.Citizenry are quite satisfied in a clime whose social order that is institutionalization of the law and order guarantees social liberty,their common heirloom and the sole conference of security upon their ways of life. It is also safe to vanguard that both opposing climes by disposition do not completely guarrantee liberty subject to this reiterated challenge of definitive incomprehensibility.In the nebulous words of Professor Laski the author of the book"Liberty,"made a gross misstatement,in favour of capitalistic society,"an effort on the part of the poor to alter in a radical way the property rights of the rich at once throws the whole scheme of liberty into jeopardy".This speech had we lived in an egalitarian democracy,embelished in an egalitarian capitalism,could be branded as heinous crime and such unguarded utterrances for the omnipotent prosperous society heavily censured in the gaol of public quarantine.Quite unfortunate Laski and his ilks were Marx disciples and apologists. The tolerant scheme of mass inequalities of wealth in capitalist society,is bound for rebuke someday similar to rebuke of totalitarian states in late 70s and 80s,and we cannot deny this empirical fact should nothing tangible take place.Take the case of British Labour party,in their effort",to alter in a radical way the property