"What ?Any difference?"
"Much objection against you and to so many ignorant folks of the same calibre of yours who lack indepth research about American history.He believed he served.He cited Royal Danish American Gazette an unbiased source excluded seethed from the prejudice of mainstream but polluted American historical source and ignorant critics.He confirmed that he served when he says"It is commonly said that Hamilton took no part in the battle yet an unnamed correspondence for Royal Danish American Gazette submitted a narrative of his own involvement.One suspect .One suspects the despatch was Hamilton's handiwork though the author identified only as a member of the "Pennsylvania troops".Along with Maryland and Delaware troops these soldiers were commanded by Hamilton's hard drinking former patron Lord Stirling and they displayed great valor".
"Uhhhhmmmm haters please....."
"Wait a minute let me finish the quotation....."In the words of Sterling's biographer,'neither he nor any one else could have predicted that this overweight,rheumatic vain pompous gluttonous inebriate would be so ardent in the battle.'The St Croix correspondent credited the bravery of Stirling's men who defended a weak position with 'but few cannons to defend them".
"The
No comments:
Post a Comment