THE SANCTITY OF VALUES.PART 9

at polar opposite to human values and no matter how much interaction
they share,human values tend to overrides withtthe maturity of
followership transition into leadership culturation of social values
and that is basically the customised benchmark  of aggregate human
values dispersed at a commonwealth of cultural contract,to which
tangled web of social values are a metaphysical and psychosocio
elements of assymetrical-symetrical art of development ethonomy.Given
the factthatnecessity isthe mother of invention,and through the
absorption ofaffordable arts,giving directiontothe schematic
procurementof technology at a particularperiod.Thistimelyinfested
management between the purpose of artandtechnologydriven by necessity
are critically responsible for the formation ofhuman and social
values.Human,political and economic values as a portraiture of
wholesome or aggregated as social values,within its obligatory charter
of cultural components'holistic patchwork settings scheduled to
amortise social debt are primed

On 7/9/18, ibikunle laniyan  wrote:
  Sometimes,the counterproductive nature of this interaction is
> chronically linked to the tardiness that occurs when both metric
> valves of pedagogical history overlaps.The structural and
> psycho-cultural motive of these calibrations is informed by the
> inadequacy of human needs that ordinarily spurs out of disuse
> technology as an organic and inorganic device for the abstract and
> material capitalisation of these needs,when the socioeconomic system's
> meters are juxtaposed. This requires sometimes,the alteration of human
> or material forms,or extant statusquo,operative standard or immodest
> condition.In this fast changing terrain of mordern age,human
> needs,spurred by competitive rivalry,growing from an acquisitive
> instatiable binge,being technically altered as they deem fit,to
> provide strategic impetus to statisfaction of metric purpose and the
> impulse buying motive of human civilisation,that the
> meters,subconsciously subscribed to by man,are either found
> technically wanton,defaultive or deficient or sanctionable.
>

THE SANCTITY OF VALUES.PART 8

A potentate change in the general worth of nature begins first and
foremost by cummulative review of existing arts and culture,customs
and tradition.The essence of human needs and the capitalisation and
material mobilisation of these needs and inherent capacity to provide
them is basically geared towards the satisfaction of human want and
dignity of esteemed survival,under resourceful commandof arts tied to
the natural strategic intents of these opossingscales and the
needs'binges itself.Does the security of human needs ever commands a
commensurate but rational or dehumanised purpose? Such purpose
givesdirection to the strategic procurement of these needs and its
particularised alimony and obligatory charter at a given period.Beit
purposeful or otherwise,the enriching dimension of its charter should
be well articulated by impact density at breathtakingpace thatwould
keep its benefits unparalleled to similar obligation.But human needs
are notexactly as complex as social need and social values similarly
operate

THE SANCTITY OF VALUES.PART 7

Sometimes,the counterproductive nature of this interaction is
chronically linked to the tardiness that occurs when both metric
valves of pedagogical history overlaps.The structural and
psycho-cultural motive of these calibrations is informed by the
inadequacy of human needs that ordinarily spurs out of disuse
technology as an organic and inorganic device for the abstract and
material capitalisation of these needs,when the socioeconomic system's
meters are juxtaposed. This requires sometimes,the alteration of human
or material forms,or extant statusquo,operative standard or immodest
condition.In this fast changing terrain of mordern age,human
needs,spurred by competitive rivalry,growing from an acquisitive
instatiable binge,being technically altered as they deem fit,to
provide strategic impetus to statisfaction of metric purpose and the
impulse buying motive of human civilisation,that the
meters,subconsciously subscribed to by man,are either found
technically wanton,defaultive or deficient or sanctionable.

THE SANCTITY OF VALUES.PART 6

Assymetry meter or Assymeteric gauges the regressive mode of change
which by itself it supplanted in contrast to progressive mode
supplanted by symeter that crystalises into operative mode when
necessity exceeds liability,to spur overaching or domineering
innovation poised to obtain a redress against the assymetrical
liabilities of the preceding generation of change epoch.The
interaction of regressive assymetric growth mode and symetric
progression is determinant ratio in the trade of sustainable capacity
building and marketing of economic,political and social development
worldwide.To enthusethat the highest portion ofdevelopment over this
variegated interaction is best implanted by tragediasis including its
velocity is to influence a landmark findings and unprecedented in the
field of development ethonomy.Hence most valetidunarian growth is
highlyprevalent with tragediasis,while assymetrical mode that
underpines revolutionary reactions,streamlined by changing necessity
of time,is the reason for changing

THE SANCTITY OF VALUES.PART 5

The bankruptcy of ethos entrenched in the valency and vagrancy of
values,commands this alterable effect,when its strategic intents and
purpose in the ministry of mission are not well aligned.In the
pedagogical patchwork of collective patrimony,value itself can be
defined as the general worth of human existence or nature at a
particular period and provided all other components of culture are
strategically held constant.Values at a particular period when traded
as a bulk cargo in its cultural metric tones are sacred prime worth of
ontology predestined to be outmoded or wipe out in its extant mode
when its liabilities exceed the operative value of necessity.That is a
tragedy of change popularly as tragediasis,a defective condition made
extinct bytragedymeter,a scale of neccesitywhen the exceed is muted.In
this patchwork scenario,the quantity and quality and extant impact of
change and discarded values can be measured. A true valuation can be
done to unravel how much tragiadiasis or assymeter has really lapsed

THE SANCTITY OF VALUES.PART 4

when properly revised or revivified or jettissoned are tied to the
preferential rudders of this ecosystem bankrolled by changing caprices
of the necessity of times.In this context unveiling its purposeful
essence,it communicates the alterable effect that reflects the timely
incorporation of this metamorphosis.Intrinsically,it is apt to say
that values like public amenities are psychosocialcultural
utilities,setting structural politics for socioeconomic system upon
which the standard of social utilities by its umbilical cord,are
tied.This variation is timely enhanced by the ratio of societal
changes and the retarded capability sometimes needed to alter the
ambiguous effect of necessity and liability,in that the resistance of
existing capacity might be inadequate to its pristine but purposeful
strategic intent.It underpines that socialvalues are incapable of
battlingsocial crisis,in the first place,unless theinherent social
virtues,its byproduct as thought possible are properly defined to
align to its purpose.

THE SANCTITY OF VALUES.PART 3

Such repression and brutish spank from their fellow but superior
humans sometimes a ridiculous tragicomedy to behold.Every meaningful
strategic impact,a judicious course of history,could lay hold upon in
the ecosystem of change for the upteempth time can only be spoonfed by
preferential scale of necessity.Emergent values from its brew are tied
to the transition or mutation of this ecosystem to be able to
subscribe to an ambitious virues sporadically gathering
pace,periodically altering sportish poors that the influence of
necessity is riveted to control in the mutation.Changing values can be
spoliation of time bound by virtues of alterable necessity which could
revoke or revivify an existing order either to tame regression or
proactively muses progression.But its strategic direction,impact and
time tested reward would be determined by the gross orientation,that a
transition of arts subscribed to this flux of alterable order
necessity.So,societalvalues intrinsically and extrinsically,implicitly
andexplicitly

THE SANCTITY OF VALUES PART 2

To be armed obliviously in this thraldom ofambiguity clearly
demystifies the tenets of this sacred gospel and a vivid
contraptionthat mystifies this labyrinth.Hence,this ignobility is
immensely exploited by the bucanneers of justice to outflank this
medesian axiom that millennia having been yoked by them had lived to
refute,let alone sanctifies its impecability.In this context of
debased values masqueraded as virtuest often times in the long run
demystifies the recoup of humanistic purport whatsoever and betrayed
by the byzanthinous change.Obviously,values especially sovereign
values or collective patrimony are nevertheless by dormancy or
practice sancrosanct;be it its showmanship inhabited within the
spectre of dynamic lanscape that make concession to its technological
necessity and advancement tied to the stronghold of this
strobelight.Then values stride in this guise where they are stoked,for
the prophetic discharge of its ministry of purpose strategic
intent.Mortals are bullied,thrashed and repressed

THE SANCTITY OF VALUES PART ONE

There is no empirical evidence that societal values are by norms like
medes and persia,immutable.Sometimes,even much more often not to
discontent ourselves with Immanuel Kant's perusal who denied that
mortals could have a clear cognition of the innermost secrets of
nature and therefore admitted that there exists some sort of
unattainable truth.Whereas Hegel postulated the subjectivity of truth
and disputed epistemological possibility beyond the confines of
rationalism.He did not believe it was feasible and had defended also
the basis of human cognition changes from generation to generation and
with no eternal truths or no eternal values,the only fixed point
philosophy can lay hold of by itself is history.The Sophists had
flexed muscles over similar contraption with Socrates and the
changeability of history is not barred of its reflection to influence
the constant flux of societal values.So therefore the sanctity of
history overrides the sanctity of values and not able to usurp the proven evidence of change.