THE DISCOVERY OF STARS:WHY THEY THINK?PART 1

THE DISOVERY OF STARS:WHY THEY THINK? We already know why great thinkers think and certainly we have no erudition problem. Time and space will often afford us to argue with the relevance of relative facts drawn from the checkered pantheon of history. .This is explored often to quell the untiring myths anf draconian controversies and stigmatised legacies that they left behind that even the conundrum of history, its tethering rope trailed, with all travails left behind in vain.In the jagged peak of this osmosis of the spangled stars' unrulies, the volcanic eruption of their colorful speek, by its exotic pedigrees that intercept our agregate reasonings, blanketed with thick swirls of cloud, for the sublime antecedence that they left behind.This forsooth would continue to observe and afflict our seared and smeared conscience,for manifold years to come.But should we be rational enough to make our marks in history, then we are compelled to make valiant strides and act to overtake my this myth or the nebula.Then this turn of events becomes fashionable and even palatable, to lovers and observers left behind us, who may be forced in due sense,from the trounce of sleepy backwaters and mental backwoods, to reenact same golden parcel of history,they have read, pull in legatees in the not so distant future and still be relevant to unborn generation.What they have read about they were made reenact ever greater chapters of golden history.Hence,this purport provides the gusto for the natural

THE THINKING FACULTY.PART 1

THE THINKING FACULTY. PART 1.There is no doubt that in the entire known Universe the biggest known faculty of human arts ever created is the brain anatomy.Let us first define the word'thinking'withut with words like thoughlessness springs like cancer and then we shall examine the thinking faculty.First, what is a thought? It is the art of thinking and thinking enterprise.It refers to intention, serious consideration, some thing thought as a result of thinking product, a particular way of thinking, idea,opinion,tribe,a particular way of thinking of social class, tribe and country. Whereas thoughtlessness refers to a state of unthinking,selfishness,lack of thought and consideration.Not paying attention to people wishes and feelings.Now , thought incorporate the art of thinking and thinking practice and we can narrow it down as the act of using one's mind to mint and produce the works of arts.It means an opinion, verdict or judgement and ideas and also refers to excessive thi .nking or thoughts about something.If we look at the verbal apposition, is the power to make judgement, take decisions ,use the mind, to form images, then opinions.Note, first burning of images, make decision, and also refers to careful consideration, understanding, bring to mind, plot and plan, intention, to remember, expect, focus, that is to direct the mind to a particular way. In the above definition, we note the properties of thought or thinking as follows:1.faith.2.intention.3.opinions.

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARTS AND DEVELOPMENT AND THE COMPLEX ROLE OF THINKING ENTERPRISE PART 2

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARTS AND DEVELOPMENT AND THE COMPLEX ROLE OF THINKING ENTERPRISE. PART.3.the urgent socialist social responsibility is to evolve egalitarian tradition where laggards and imperialists equally importantIn the egalitarian trade of tradition of the middle course, where thy artistic cycle, develpment cycle and cultural cycle respectively, that equates cause them also equate themsel. First development begins at the level of the individual and indiduality is the basic essence of human development. Growth and development often interchangeably used begin with arts, or growth in skills and capacity, then institutionalisation of cultural vlues that emergent custom and tradition give the human artists at every point of evolution and radical explosion. Human development, implies material well being of the mankind but first of the arts. Human development must continually generate growth in the form of personnalism first.Personal development is synonymous with human development, not devolving market imperial tradition.Human civilization,cannot survive without material relation which generate human development and such human development is tied to the emerging social groups

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARTS AND DEVELOPMENT AND THE COMPLEX ROLE OF THINKING ENTERPRISE.PART 1

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ARTS AND DEVELOPMENT AND THE COMPLEX ROLE OF THINKING ENTERPRISE. PART 1.If we consider the long road by which we have trodded and journeyed from the bank of savages into freemen, this tortuous road indeed could be nasty a labyrinth to peruse.How much worse,from the evolution of arts into the industrial institution of development. The blogger examines the case study and proffer market solution. -AUTHOR. In the dispensation of arts and cultural management, we shall have to contend the tardy evolution of professional arts itself, in the much same way, we have comprehended growth and apprehend it,at least the growth of traditional art into industrial arts.This also includes the evolution of traditional thinking into scientific thinking and joined by stategic thinking the midwife in the entire thinking enterprise right. Now, the dispersal of professional art, by voyage of its system of artist cycle,that feeds cultural cycle must be distributed evenly.Otherwise the dispersal of arts,precisely to say to professional arts or where technical evolution of environmental forces favour evolution of one generation of professional arts,over the other generation of traditional arts.If left uncurbed,such inequal distribution of information freedom,triggers high inequalities of the wealth.As the former automatically ascends the knowledge power curve, the other fallen behind, the sturdy structural inequalities is bound to persist.

THE ART OF TRADITIONAL THINKING PART 3

CHAPTER 5.THE ART OF TRADITIONAL THINKING. PART.3.This pest of bombardments barely sway the mental energy of the softline knowledge consumers and they are not freed until the uperio rgum ment of the superior tradition.In most cases,the softline knowledge consumers, with parlous data processing mentality, lackadaisical mode and in most cases,are vectors, devoid of first hand information and rumours and hearsays,are effervescent traits of this mode.Sometimes artist's lack of preparedness and qualitative contribution to emporium's mode of argument, automatically leads to poor presentation.During poor presentation,discussants u nder weight of an intensive argument,bugged down, by mental stress and then terminal exhaustion of logical viewpoints can lead to presentation of prejudice with unguarded precaution.Mental stress tends to ochestrate such psychological assaults,experienced by so ftline knowledge consumers,when they crash under yoke of superior argument.It does not spare hard line punchers too,who can be lulled into downhill presentation,a meltdown period of memory loss.In this context where a huge.In this context,a huge database load of fact is explored in dissertation like discourse the suffocation of latent stress instantaneously leads to mental convulsion,causes amnesia and prejudiced discourse.On the hand, a witty fan or discusant might be particularly disposed to assault fellow discusant and adopted wearing downs tatics.It may be in a quest for native intelligence,to

THE ART OF TRADITIONAL THINKING PART2

CHAPTER 5,THE ART OF TRADITIONAL THINKING. PART.2.by mudslinging,could be source of operating argument. Sentiment or prejudice could form source of an argument and prejudice, can be intricately linked with the ignorance of the discussant.It implie and mere analysis can form the whole bulk of knowledge.We might not be forced to contend that ignorance itself is a stage in knowledge formation.Knowledge logical or illogical can spring from diverse sources,namely the ablution,that include,sentiment,fact, opinion and a host of other source.I classified it as illogical in contrast to fact based or logical.Generally speaking, argument sprouts from different dimensions,flows in counterclockwise direction.Sometimes,its clockwise direction can be punctured by assymetry of standpoint and ensuring safeguard of fact at hand.The mode of argument partly formed by prejudices,might not be punctured by emerging fact, but also by the nature of clarity and logic that supplants the emerging fact.When the clarity is convincing,ample evidence of the presentation distortion automatically warrants the emergence and presentation of the fact at hand, to tarnish the riddles of the haunting prejudice.Although these sources along side sentiments tends to make discussion thick,and undoubtedly,illogical discourse with high ratio of ignorance quashes and decimates the quality of discourse.Hardline knowledge punchers and consumers beyond its facial impression of argumentatives are pissed at its bathos herald

THE ART OF TRADITIONAL THINKING.part 1

CHAPTER 5 THE ART OF TRADITIONAL THINKING.part 1.Every spoken word is determined by spoken thoughts. Those spoken thoughts unheard in most cases,by majority refrain into subconscious untill utterances in question s are made..Similarly every written word is dependent or determined by written thoughts, though unseen, prior to its documentation, in physical terms.So, nothing happens by itself, except if it be by a moving force.Now, we are poised to peruse the extant mode of traditional thinking and scientific thinking and more or less its mode of its argument. In this case,we examine the first mode apriori or posterior respectively.Various research into traditional mode of judgements,informed this verdict,specifically through its juxtapository process,follows its hysterical rendition.These modes of argument were unveiled by the author,based on empirical evidences evaluation of newsstands surveys,where he was fortunate and frequented periodically for two decades where he was embroiled in such intellectual wrangling exercise,with free readers and few hotbeds.Arguments and counter arguments,by discussants in all dimensions, be it social, political, economic and cultural nuances, reflects the fortitude of africana Jones'mental energy. The traditional mode of argument often follows the editorial logic of the day and argument in general comes from general sources.Apart from opinions, sentiments and statistics, assumption resulting from undue pressure, after a long diatribe, crimsoned

CHAPTER 4.SCIENTIFIC DECISION MANAGEMENT.

CHAPTER 4.SCIENTIFIC DECISION MANAGEMENT:Part 1.The scientificity of traditional decision making and management rest largely upon the tussles of volition per capital and the psychocentric amenities that its quandrant based dimension provides in which responsibiity management, and the market rational scale of opportunities,offers itself the strategic capacity in reacting and altering the cultural components,interacting with the immediate environment. The moral architecture of scientific decision making and management,is catalysed by doctrine of market rational forces and sometimes the sentimental apparatus,from which they are driven,demanded for and shuttled or discharge of its obligationfrom the point of causal and time investment,launching activity and undertaken activity management for the survival of satisfactory life.Scientific decision making opens advanced traditional thinking and then scientific thinking mode of activity administration.Besides using the strategic thinking enterprise,to manage their innovative solution, specifically in their paradigm shift it also in both cases, through strategic thinking manages their induring industrialisation of obligation. On a diurnal basis,we take decisions, proper or improper, hinging every strategic motive on every strategic move and task at hand.Scientific decision grows exponentially, but not with strategic demand to accelerates their material

MARX,MARXISM AND NEOMARXISM.PART 2

MARX,MARXISM AND NEOMARXISM:WHICH WAY MOVES HISTORY FORWARD.2.The father of existentialism. They both took their departure from Hegelian school of philosophy and tha put an end to the epoch of great philosophical system that was begun from Descartes in the 17th century.Hence after Hegel,philosophy took on a new course entirely,driven by Marx and Kierkegaard,and existentialism simply means the philosophy of action, and Marx, even thou-gh he was a Marxist, became the greatest of all his existentialist colleagues.His notable words-That 'philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways,the point is to change'and that is what he had done through Marxism, though still leaves much to be desired.Marxism vs Hegelian:Marx himself became a Marxism, after the European revolution of 1848, brought Marxism to the front burner, to the frontiers of European cultural Renaissance.Contrary to Hegelian, that world spirit was driven by spiritual relation moving history forward, Marx disagreed that Hegel, the best of the Romantic scholarship, was turning things upside down and he showed otherwise.He had believed it is the ownership means of production,that material relation moves history forward. He contrast sharply that it is the material change that affect history and that spiritual relation do not affect material relation.It is the other way round, that material changes,create spiritual relation.Antiquity's philosophy and science were mere theoretical proposition and the economic...

MARX,MARXISM AND NEOMARXISM.PART1

MARX,MARXISM AND NEOMARXISM:WHICH WAY MOVES HISTORY FORWARD.1.The emergence of Marxism in the 1840s changes everything in the adventure of western philosophy.The blogger Ii Ibikunle Laniyan examines the critical significance of Marism to history and the comparison with Hegelian, to to determine the quality of Marxism.Enjoy the reading. The development of art and culture according to Marxism,including economy flourishes through the interaction of the society's substructure and superstructure.Karl Marx(1848-1883)was often fond of historical materialism and this dialectical interaction, through which history and world spirit progress that he made it the cornerstone of his philosophy.There is no doubt that Marx and Marxism had an indelible influence on the scholarship of history,historicism, philosphy,art and culture respectively. There is no yet freeing the hassle that the cannon of Marxism,waslong after him nor an ample claim after his departure, until we have learnt to change history and then the world.When in 1841, Kierkegaard went to Berlin,according to an historian he might have sat next to Marx, at Schelling's lectures.The former had written his master of arts ' thesis on Socrates, which Marx did his doctoral thesis' On the materialists of Antiquity,' specifically Democritus and Epicurus.Marx became the father of marxism mm after 1840s, in the much same Soren Kierkegaard became the

MARX,MARXISM AND NEOMARXISM PART 3

MARX, MARXISM AND NEOMARXISM : WHICH WAY MOVES HISTORY FORWARD.3. Life of the community including production was based on slave exploitation or slave labor, desecrated practical innovation and that is a true evidence of how materialrelation influences societal orientation. The basis of the society according to Marx, include the material, social, economic relations, while the superstructure include morals, arts, science, religion and philosophy.And by proving various interactions between these opposites, Marx,was labelled a dialectical materialist and not a mechanical materialist that could not prove their interaction, in the assymetry of history . I n the basis of the society, Marx recognises the mode, means and condition of production and the question of what was morally right was a product of his basis orientation, where the society's ruling class sets the norm of what was morally right or wrong. He concluded that who control the ownership means of production are principally, the moulders of history, moulders of people's destiny.That these interactions are not autonomous, and that the society's superstructure had no independent history of its own and no one functions in isolation. The changes in this basis had accounted for historical development, evolving from the antiquity into the industrial society of mordern age. More over, for the entire phases of history, there had been conflicts between two classes, for instance, in the antiquity's slave society, they had slave and

THE SEVEN DEADLY SINS OF THOUGHTLESSNESS.

CHAPTER? THE SEVEN DEADLY SINS OF THOUGHLESSNESS .PART 1.Thoughtlessness or Witlesness as a reprobate affliction of the social psyche,can be guded against by preventing the occurrence of its seen deadly sins.We examine the delicate path, man must must avoid.Now, take a look:1.See meaning, if you cannot see(sightlessness); 2.If you cannot feel(emotionlessness);3. if you cannot show willingness, lack of volition(apathy);4.if you cannot taste,no appetite or have a foretaste(tastelessness);5.if you cannot think, not using your horsesense (senselessness); 6.if you cannot hear (hearlessness/tympanum death);7.if you can not believe (faithlessness).The first five objective sensors correspond with five human senses and then add horsesense making the 6th sense and then the 7th sense, the faith sense.Hence contrary to Grecian claim that humans have five senses, it is seven senses rather. We hardly use the core senses well,talkless of the whole lump.Now,it appears majority of us hardly use it well and we are confronted with thoughlessness like epidemics or pandemics.They are supposed lit our way through every mission, with cultural task at hand. We are bound to fail, if we abhor them and because of ignorance, we proliferate these deadly sins that underpins our moral failure.We cannot use our vast potential,reduce us to a mere bland observation,without a recognition of these glorious light of mankind.And because of this artistic insubordination that the light is darkness we are damn dead.

LARA AT ST.BLUES STREET.PART 5

 LARA'S AT ST.BLUES.A PLAY FROM THE ANTHOLOGIES OF ST.BLUES QUEER STREET. PART 5.JOHN:Hearken now to bankrupt your tedious reticence, away from your gibberish and retire to labour "Involuntarily, they resumed labour on the farmfield. And to her office, she was headed in huff, looked obscene, at the officious temperament of her employee director and banged the door behind,in the quandary escort of the director, who was later embarrassed over her weeping.                     

  John:Why the yell madam.A worker must work to get paid.So, what the fuss madam, weeping over your sloth labourers, that you seem to engage them in untimely discourse?Will thou avail them from labour, so you can pay sloth for their indolence? But this much of your grief, want to exude clemency for grief. Why the yell, I do still perplexed much of my navel.                                            

 Lara:See, let me weep, if you m indeed cannot, I can weep.Let my emotive bank its catharsis tear apart .   John:Then what weep, weep do you weep?                        

 Lara:I cannot choose but to weep, for my brethren.Now, they serve me.                                                   John:You mean you know those sloths.                              

  Lara:Dont embarrass me please.You call my old school mates sloth?                                                                                                                                              

LARA AT ST.BLUES PART 3

LARA'S AT ST.BLUES.A POETIC DIALOGUE FROM THE ANTHOLOGIES OF ST.BLUES QUEER STREET. PART 3.Oh what sacred plough in her poohpooh, for still in her pooh pooh, ploughs a lonely furrows . Never did herself a red herring, drawn across the rail, ev me ince her red flag shot.She was engrossed for a pound,from being in for a penny until the days of reckoning. They behold that Rome was not built in a day, what pyrhic victory, beckons she; for history barely cast pearls, before nebulous swines.See, how history exhume the escutcheon's blot, in a turtle of dual deconium.And so the dead horse was flogged to death.                       

Enter the labourforce and exasperated. Clara and Adeoti.                                                                               Clara:Oh we are the sport of stigma, another fortune's tool.                                                                            Adeoti:What vile beginners of fray are we? Did I hear it right that capitalist is a gorgeous maiden, still in her early thirties.                                                                                      

Clara:what piercing steel for us, of a colleen in our age bracket?                                                                    Adeoti:Had we not sojourn offshore brothel, that we be not mewed in this haunting heaviness, from which bliss,we could still have reveled.Let it flee.

 

LARA AT ST.BLUES

LARA'S AT ST.BLUES.A POETIC DIALOGUE FROM THE ANTHOLOGIES OF ST.BLUES QUEER STREET. PART 2. .Either be stoned,before depression, be, boredom or by the stress of distress, restricted from trenches. Transit not in thy state:I'll be on

the tapis to enquire the silvermoon, and it shall be boon to mine golden age. Every good charm to thee, that much vaunted stalwarts to your relief.Give me a breathing space tis farewell to my distress, bid I riddance, And that joy that exceeds joy to soothe my navel , kiss me with my laurel.                 

 Clara:Have you convinced her? I've been thinking so, time by time's laughter ridiculous ridicules, mortals its kinsmen. And so I did not notify myself. Well we were made to bliss and stress, peradventure stress and distress bedridden, but to exit this distress, anew, let this plain by us depart.                      

  Adeoti:this woo fell on her deaf ears, earshot amiss, and to her limpet, she was clung.                                Clara:Why the refrain to accord the Rubicon, in rough and tumble ? A rolling moss gather no stone.This ropes I did blatantly know without prejudice and none wire pulling could unmake her to turn her turtle and fortune smiles that eludes the minnow's tritons.Had the nine days wonder at the twinkling of an eye, not vamoose into obscurity of history?Solitary confinement, pays her earnestly with a lone ranger's pedigree, baring to the plough, to put her back

 

LARA AT ST BLUES.PART 6

 LARA'S AT ST.BLUES.A Poetic dialogue from ST.BLUES QUEER STREET. PART 6.                           

   John:You mean your employees, were your former school mates.oh my gosh!                                          Lara:Dont ever call them sloth? Okay. How come you call them sloth?                                                          John:they lamented squandering their time away, in foreign brothels.I had firsthand information and am quite sure.                                                                                                                                                 Lara:You are getting on my nerves.Can you defend yourself, when you meet them?                                     John:Of course.i can call them.                                                  

 Lara:please give had enough .dont embarrass me.             

 John:What do you really want?                                                   

Lara:recall them to my office and

 place adverts immediately  on paper for ten farm wor kers.