to
the disintegration of Soviet Union in early nineties, when he was
nominated to the Supreme court, and having written over seven hundreds
opinion, his quirky view about race being the center of his
jurisprudence, hasnt change a bit.He must have been a disciple of
Oliver Wendel Holmes, to me tosubscribe to the legal realism that took
the nation's courts by storm, during his childhood period, which was
dealt a blow by H.L.Hart of the school of legal formalism.The passage of
times as well as that of the checkered erudition,has come with
extrinsic and intrinsic force that propel Thomas, to revive, the fate of
legal realism, once advocated also by Benjamin Cardoso, Roscoe Pound
etc. The author himself barely discountenance the probity or mendacity
of Thomas postulation, but to append with historical fact, the empirical
evidence of institutionalized vintage fallacious position of the social
enterprise's debased value. The complex challenge of immutable
psychological position in this racial context of intangible or tangible
vintage fallacious libido is racial inequality, a boon to the bucaneers
of justice. Human and social prejudices of the arts system, with
lopsided value system reflects the summersaults of the human or social
intergrity.Much more appalling to be seen to interogate the intergrable
industrialisation and interoperability value of universal
justice,shortchanged by the operative structural inadequacies of the
human or social prejudices. The stressful nature of this
 | 
|
No comments:
Post a Comment