THE CONCEPT OF SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY.part 19

However for a large swathe of mortal history,the nature of social relations in the corresponding growth of social relationship and social responsibility axis tends to change in the same walenght as grant of great charters evolve in the social engineering context either drive n by evolution or revolution .This change is often catapulted by power triangle phenomenon like class revolt to cite revolutionary mode for instance with peasant rise into being entrepreneurs armed with economic power and feudal lord becoming influential with political power and humanists or reformers gaining social power.We do not denounce the complex role of social relation of production termed as the golden transition as repetitively refer to.The social interaction of social architecture especially social relation web with power triangle phenomenon invariably accelerate this mode of phenomenon.

Economic development, political development, social development and a host of variegated types emerge from the social interaction of the superstructure and substructure of the social system in the development cycle transition using the humanistic mode of often imperial power triangle phenomenon. Understanding this concept of social responsibility allows strategic thinking for strategic planning for the purpose of planned development not as it were in the ancient but more as it in the mordern era.True development we agreed was economic development and infact economic development in parlance of market neoliberalism was begun at the beginning of the mordern era.This was strikingly discretionary a distinction compared to prior era before the reformation of 16th century.Hence from the period the word economic development had been a domineering influence on the sanctity of development trade.With the emergence of physiocrats,bullionists,mercentilists, classical and neoclassical economists and keynesianism like Thomas mum,J.B.Says,Richard Cantillon,David Hume,Adam Smith,David Ricardo, Thomas Malthus,Alfred Marshall,Maynard Keynes, Million Friedman, Fredrick Von Hayek and Simon Kutznets and a host of other top grade economists provided evergreen economic measurement template that was instrumental to unprecedented growth of mordern economy during the period.The dominant influence had come to alienate other forms of development, downplay the notion to unveil the hidden facts behind power triangle phenomenal abuse of power in the social relation of production manipulation of factors of production to the detrimental naivety of the bottom percentiles or at their extent to the boon of the upper echelon of the triangle.Social development also requires a virile framework to rebirth its strategic sphere of social relation stay relevance and maintain relevance boost equalitarian ownership of production, redistribute ways and means of production, including affordable access to diverse production technology and available production relations to achieve the essence of historical growth.

This incorrigible concept of social and historical dimensions of development allows no recognition for pristine form of golden transition to be alienated from the true development concept.The unsung unsustainability nature of economic growth is not extremely detached from the decrepit propensities of derivative theoretical economics that alienate equal distribution of wealth and consider full employment and poverty eradication a ridiculous anathema to mordern age of market neoliberalism.